Salvage
No cure - no pay
The first modern text of the Lloyd’s Form of Salvage Agreement
(universally known as Lloyd’s Open Form, or LOF) was adopted in
1892. By 1908 the text had been standardised. Since then LOF has undergone
10 revisions; the current edition is LOF 2000, introduced in September
2000 (see
origins of Lloyd's Form for a history of LOF).
The LOF contract continues to evolve, to meet changing circumstances
and new concerns - most recently the priority now given to protection
of the marine environment.
LOF is the most widely used “no cure-no pay” salvage
contract. In return for salvage services, the salvor receives a proportion
of the “salved value” (the value of the ship, its bunkers
and cargo). Traditionally, reward depends upon success and the recovery
of property. In the past, if there was no recovery, there was no payment,
whatever the expense of the operation. This has changed in recent years,
to reflect the public interest in prevention of damage to the environment.
The salvor can now contract in such a way that he is shielded from loss
when responding to high risk or low value casualties.
|
|
|
Fierce fire: tugs drench the blaze on the tanker
Cape Horn, following an accident at Livorno in March 2003.
The vessel was carrying a cargo of methanol.
|
|
|
There are various alternative “national” forms of salvage
contract, such as the Japanese Form, Beijing Form, Moscow Form and Turkish
Form. LOF, however, remains the internationally preferred contract.
A total of 5,135 salvage operations were performed by ISU members in
the period 1978-2005. Of this total, 2,701 operations were carried out
under LOF, no cure-no pay. The “salved value” of ships,
bunkers and cargoes involved in these operations totalled some US$ 32.32
billion.
LOF is administered in London by the Salvage and Guarantees Department
of Lloyd’s. The contract is designed to encourage instant action
to save ships and cargoes, by avoiding delays that might otherwise arise
from commercial haggling. The resolution of disputes, together with
the assessment of the salvage award, is deferred until the salvage task
is completed. The parties can get on with the job, safe in the knowledge
that - at the end of the day - there will be a fair and just conclusion.
There are around 100 LOF cases notified to Lloyd's each year (80 in
2006); only a proportion are arbitrated. The majority are settled commercially,
on an amicable basis (usually with a significant saving in both expense
and time). ISU members are expected to be realistic in
their security demands and Award/Settlement expectations
in cases involving modest and straightforward salvage
services.
|
|
|
Terror at sea: the partly laden VLCC Limburg burns following an
explosion resulting from a terrorist attack off Yemen. An ISU salvor
extinguished the fire. The tanker's cargo was discharged by ship-to-ship
transfer.
|
|
|
The salvage award - a proportion of the salved value of the property
(ship and cargo) recovered by the salvor - is fixed by an experienced
Arbitrator appointed from a panel of Lloyd's Salvage Arbitrators. The
Arbitrator applies an internationally accepted set of criteria in order
to assess the award. The criteria take account of many factors, including:
the degree of danger; the value of the property salved; the skill and
effort in preventing damage to the environment; the expenses incurred;
the level of service provided; and the salvor's long term investment
in tugs and other vessels and equipment which may be required on an
infrequent basis.
The LOF 80 (1980) edition of the contract moved beyond the traditional
no cure-no pay concept, by providing a “Safety Net” for
salvors responding to laden oil tankers requiring salvage assistance.
The “Safety Net” guaranteed that the salvor’s expenses
would be paid in the event that the value of the salved property was
insufficient to provide for a normal salvage award. In addition, the
salvor received an increment of up to a maximum of 15 per cent of
his expenses, if he succeeded in preventing or mitigating pollution.
LOF 80 was something of a stop-gap. Article 14 of The Salvage Convention
1989 introduced a new incentive scheme, known as “Special Compensation”.
This becomes payable by the shipowner when the salvor has prevented
or minimised damage to the environment, but the value of the salved
property is insufficient to provide for a normal salvage award. The
scope of this incentive was increased, by making it applicable to any
vessel and cargo threatening damage to the environment. Furthermore,
the potential increment on expenses, to reward success, was increased
to a maximum level of 100 per cent. Whereas LOF 80 applied in all waters,
however, this Special Compensation was restricted to salvage services
in "coastal waters and areas adjacent thereto". The LOF 90
contract (superseded by LOF 95 and LOF 2000) gave immediate effect
to Article 14.
|
|
|
Grounded in the Scheldt: two ISU salvors went into
action following the grounding of the car carrier
Grande Argentina. The vessel was refloated and
escorted into Flushing.
|
|
|
Special Compensation proved to be a cost-effective incentive scheme,
but there were difficulties in assessing the amount due under Article
14. As a result, an alternative system for Special Compensation remuneration,
known as SCOPIC (Special Compensation P&I Clause), was developed
by salvors, P&I Clubs (the shipowners' liability insurers), underwriters
and other parties. SCOPIC is straightforward. It may be invoked by the
salvor at any time (but with financial penalties if SCOPIC is invoked
in inappropriate circumstances). There is no requirement to demonstrate
the existence of a pollution threat in a particular geographic area.
Remuneration is based on pre-agreed tariff rates. SCOPIC took effect
in August 1999. The latest edition is SCOPIC 2008. In the period from SCOPIC's introduction in late 1999 to
March 2007 there were
844
Lloyd's Form cases.
The SCOPIC clause was invoked on 183 occasions (22% of the total) and
only five SCOPIC cases have gone to arbitration.
|
|
< Previous |
Next >
|
|